This article answers the question I get asked most often: what actually happens in a session when I read a client's field?
I enter into resonance and pick up a distortion in the field — a place where something is blocking the free flow of energy, a place words haven't reached yet. I see images that don't belong to that person personally. I pick up signals that seem to have arrived long before they were born.
Even back in university, studying psychology and Jung's work, I saw something in these ideas that went beyond academic theory. But it took years of practice for me to really understand how three schools of thought — Jung, Hellinger, and Schore — each touch, in their own way, the same field I work with every day. I want to say this plainly upfront: these three sources carry very different levels of evidence. Schore is confirmed neuroscience. Jung and Hellinger are deep, influential, but not empirically proven models of the psyche. I work at the intersection of all three, and I want to show that intersection transparently, rather than blending them into one "proven truth."
Jung: a hypothesis about a deeper layer of the psyche
Carl Jung introduced the idea of the collective unconscious — a deeper layer of the psyche shared by all of humanity, home to archetypes and patterns that can't be reduced to personal experience.
It's worth being clear: this is a philosophical-psychological concept, not an experimentally proven fact by the standards of modern science. It remains influential and clinically useful for many therapists, but it doesn't carry the same evidentiary weight as, say, Schore's neuroscience.
When I enter into resonance with a client's field, I'm not analyzing their words. I'm paying attention to where their personal story seems to touch something larger — the archetype of the Mother, the Victim, the Exile. Jung gave us language for this space. I use that language as a working metaphor, not as a proven mechanism.
Hellinger: a model, not an established law
Bert Hellinger, working with thousands of people through family constellations, described a recurring pattern: a person can carry the fate of someone they never met — not because they know about it, but because they unconsciously identify with an unlived story from their family line.
This is a powerful clinical model. But it should be said directly: Hellinger's method of family constellations doesn't have the kind of rigorous experimental base that neuroscience does, and part of the academic psychological community treats it with caution for exactly that reason. That doesn't mean the model is useless — many therapeutic approaches work through narrative and meaning rather than proven mechanism alone. But I won't call it a "law," the way it's sometimes presented in popular accounts of the method.
In empathic reading, I use this model as a working lens: I pick up whose longing this is — hers, or her great-grandmother's; whose fear pattern this is. Hellinger gave me a map for interpretation. It's a map, not proven territory.
Schore: here, the science is actually on the table
Allan Schore is the one of the three whose work belongs to rigorous, testable neuroscience. His research has shown that the human psyche forms through relationship, and that the right hemispheres of two people can synchronize during direct contact.
This has been demonstrated experimentally: two nervous systems in direct contact — a mother and infant, a therapist and client in the same room — can enter a state of mutual resonance through tone of voice, gaze, micro-movements, the rhythm of breath.
One important clarification, so as not to misrepresent what Schore actually proved: his research is about resonance between people who are physically present with each other, here and now. It isn't about reading information about third parties, past generations, or events that happened before a person was born. When my work goes beyond those limits, that's no longer Schore's neuroscience — it's my own practical extrapolation, built on years of clinical experience, not directly on his research.
Epigenetics: real data, a debated mechanism
Current research shows that severe stress experienced by ancestors can be linked to specific biological markers in their descendants. Yehuda's 2016 study found altered patterns related to the FKBP5 gene in children of Holocaust survivors.
Precision matters here too: the actual mechanism of transgenerational epigenetic transmission of trauma in humans remains a subject of scientific debate — researchers disagree about how much of this is proven causal transmission versus indirect correlation or the effect of upbringing. I use this data as an indication that the body can carry some form of imprint from ancestral history — not as a fully settled fact.
Where I stand at this intersection
Jung said: we're immersed in a deeper, shared layer of the psyche.
Hellinger said: we can carry family histories as a model for understanding symptoms.
Schore proved: our nervous systems can resonate with one another in direct contact — that's a fact, not a hypothesis.
Epigenetics shows: the body carries some biological trace of ancestors — a mechanism science is still working out.
Empathic reading is a method I build at the intersection of a proven mechanism of resonance (Schore) and interpretive models (Jung, Hellinger), adding my own years of clinical experience through picking up distortions in the field — places where something is blocking the free flow of energy. That's what a contract is: a promise to carry someone else's pain, held on every level of a person, from the body and psyche to the subtlest dimension. I don't present interpretation as if it were the same thing as proven fact — but it's exactly at this intersection, in my experience, where the deepest work happens with what a person can't yet put into words.
Victoria Vysochanska
Regressologist, alfa-state practitioner · Alfa Vita
alfavita.space
Scientific sources:
Jung, C.G. (1959). The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious. Princeton University Press.
Jung, C.G. (1960). Synchronicity. Princeton University Press.
Hellinger, B. (1998). Love's Hidden Symmetry.
Hellinger, B. (2003). Acknowledging What Is.
Schore, A.N. (1994). Affect Regulation and the Origin of the Self.
Schore, A.N. (2012). The Science of the Art of Psychotherapy.
Yehuda, R. et al. (2016). Holocaust Exposure Induced Intergenerational Effects on FKBP5 Methylation. Biological Psychiatry.
Claude is AI and can make mistakes. Please double-check responses.